Sunday, November 17, 2013
Dr. Ronald Jones' OUTSTANDING confirmation of the front entrance wound on Face The Nation 11/17/1963
At 3:40 of the video above, Dr. Ronald Jones, chief surgical resident at
Parkland Hospital on 11/22/1963, and now Chairman of Surgery at Baylor University
made a staggering admission in a rather innocent conversation on Face The
Nation with Bob Schieffer on the 11/17/2013 show when he stated, “I saw a small
hole in the President’s throat about ¼ of an inch…before Dr. Perry made a
tracheotomy in the wound in the throat”.
Dr. Jones attested to the fact that Drs. Carrico and Perry were both in
Trauma Room One with him working on the President after the assassination
attempt.
Dr.
Carrico attested to the wound collar surrounding the entrance wound in
the throat when he said, "(wound collars to entrance wounds are found on
ALL entrance wounds) AS THEY ALWAYS ARE" TO HAROLD WEISBERG. See my
previous post below.
Dr. Jones attests to the "small wound in the throat about 1/4 of an inch."
THESE DOCTORS ARE NOT LYING!
Friday, November 15, 2013
FRONT THROAT SHOT CONFIRMATION BY DR. CARRICO & DR. PERRY
FRONT SHOT EVIDENCE CONFIRMED
A Critical examination of the words
of both Dr. Charles Carrico & Dr. Malcolm Perry discovered by Harold Weisberg irrefutably proves a front
entrance shot to the throat.
In his outstanding work on the Kennedy Assassination, Harold
Weisberg uncovered a definitive attestation from Dr. Malcolm Perry that, in
this author’s belief, unknowingly confirmed the front throat wound as a wound
of entrance. The words written by Harold
Weisberg cannot be any more clear for us.
His analysis is striking.
“As
I lead him (Dr. Perry) over those events (the Parkland Hospital procedures with
the President) and his participation, what he did and the sequence, he recalled
that he first looked at the wound (in the throat), then asked a nurse for a
“trake” (short for tracheotomy) tray, wiped off the wound, saw a ring of
bruising around it, and started cutting.
In describing the appearance of the wound and the ring of bruising, he
used the words, “as they always are.”
Pretending not to notice the significance of this important fact he had
let the bubble out, I retraced the whole procedure with him again. When he had repeated the same words, I asked
him if he had ever been asked about the ringed bruise around the wound in front
of the neck. The question told the
experienced hunter and the experienced surgeon exactly what he had admitted,
one description of an entrance wound. He
blushed and improvised the explanation that there was blood around the
wound. I did not further embarrass him
by pressing him, for we both knew he had seen the wound clearly. He had twice
said he had wiped the blood off and had seen the wound clearly, if briefly,
before cutting.
The
official representation and that of an unofficial apologist to which we shall
come would have us believe that bruising is a characteristic of entrance wounds
only. This is not the case. The reader should not be deceived on this or
by Perry’s admission that there was bruising.
Exit wounds also can show bruising.
One difference is that exit wounds do not have to show bruising. That in this case there was bruising by
itself need not be taken as an expression of Perry’s professional opinion that
it was a wound of entrance. The
definitive answer is in those words he twice used, quoted directly above,“
‘as they always are’. It is an entrance
wound only that always are of this description.
Thus, Dr. Perry had said again and in a different way that this was a
shot from the front. In context, this is
also the only possible meaning of what Carrico had said.”
Sunday, November 10, 2013
JIM MARRS PROVES GRASSY KNOLL SHOOTER
Outstanding new confirmable evidence that during the assassination,
Lee Bowers saw the muzzle flash and gun smoke! The gun smoke
immediately waffed into Elm Street and was captured on film by the
Weigman photos! PLEASE WATCH THIS SHOW ON THE TRAVEL CHANNEL / and
other channels.
Marrs and Baker recreated the grassy knoll shooter (helmet / hat man) firing from the parallel fence to elm street. Forget Badgeman! THE PUFF OF SMOKE CAPTURED BY WEIGMAN PHOTO IN CIRCLE BELOW & HELMET / HAT MAN SNIPER SEEN IN THE MOORMAN PHOTO (below Weigman photo) BY THE TREE BEHIND THE THREE MEN ON THE GRASSY KNOLL. Lee Bower view of the sniper is the final photo below. CONTRARY TO BLUE RECTANGLE COMMENTARY (LEE BOWERS DID SEE A SHOOTER, PUFF OF SMOKE AND "FLASH" (MUZZLE FLASH) IN THE BLUE RECTANGLE! IT PROVES THE GRASSY KNOLL SHOOTER!
Marrs and Baker recreated the grassy knoll shooter (helmet / hat man) firing from the parallel fence to elm street. Forget Badgeman! THE PUFF OF SMOKE CAPTURED BY WEIGMAN PHOTO IN CIRCLE BELOW & HELMET / HAT MAN SNIPER SEEN IN THE MOORMAN PHOTO (below Weigman photo) BY THE TREE BEHIND THE THREE MEN ON THE GRASSY KNOLL. Lee Bower view of the sniper is the final photo below. CONTRARY TO BLUE RECTANGLE COMMENTARY (LEE BOWERS DID SEE A SHOOTER, PUFF OF SMOKE AND "FLASH" (MUZZLE FLASH) IN THE BLUE RECTANGLE! IT PROVES THE GRASSY KNOLL SHOOTER!
Friday, November 8, 2013
Dr. Carrico / PARKLAND: The movie
In the movie, Dr. Carrico called the front throat entrance wound, "It's a
wound." when asked by Dr. Perry regarding the trach incision.
BUT,
BUT,
FRONT SHOT EVIDENCE #5
A Critical examination of the words
of Dr. Charles Carrico discovered by Harold Weisberg irrefutably proves a front
entrance shot to the throat.
In his outstanding work on the Kennedy Assassination,Harold
Weisberg uncovered a definitive attestation from Dr. Malcolm Perry that, in
this author’s belief, unknowingly confirmed the front throat wound as a wound
of entrance. The words written by Harold
Weisberg cannot be any more clear for us.
His analysis is striking.
“As
I lead him (Dr. Perry) over those events (the Parkland Hospital procedures with
the President) and his participation, what he did and the sequence, he recalled
that he first looked at the wound (in the throat), then asked a nurse for a
“trake” (short for tracheotomy) tray, wiped off the wound, saw a ring of
bruising around it, and started cutting.
In describing the appearance of the wound and the ring of bruising, he
used the words, “as they always are.”
Pretending not to notice the significance of this important fact he had
let bubble out, I retraced the whole procedure with him again. When he had repeated the same words, I asked
him if he had ever been asked about the ringed bruise around the wound in front
of the neck. The question told the
experienced hunter and the experienced surgeon exactly what he had admitted,
one description of an entrance wound. He
blushed and improvised the explanation that there was blood around the
wound. I did not further embarrass him
by pressing him, for we both knew he had seen the wound clearly. He had twice
said he had wiped the blood off and had seen the wound clearly, if briefly,
before cutting.
The
official representation and that of an unofficial apologist to which we shall
come would have us believe that bruising is a characteristic of entrance wounds
only. This is not the case. The reader should not be deceived on this or
by Perry’s admission that there was bruising.
Exit wounds also can show bruising.
One difference is that exit wounds do not have to show bruising. That in this case there was bruising by
itself need not be taken as an expression of Perry’s professional opinion that
it was a wound of entrance. The
definitive answer is in those words he twice used, quoted directly above,“
‘as they always are’. It is an entrance
wound only that always are of this description.
Thus, Dr. Perry had said again and in a different way that this was a
shot from the front. In context, this is
also the only possible meaning of what Carrico had said.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment