LESSON #10 AT 18.3 ZAPRUDER FRAMES PER SECOND / 2.3 SECONDS FOR OSWALD TO SHOOT / OSWALD COULD NEVER MAKE THE SHOTS IN TIME TO CORRESPOND TO THE ZAPRUDER FILM FRAMES.

CHRIS, ABOVE IS THE PHIL WILLIS #7 PHOTO.  IT IS AT ZAPRUDER FILM FRAME 207.
PRESIDENT KENNEDY IS NOT HIT YET WITH ANY BULLET. (Black Arrow pointing down at JFK in the photo)


CHRIS, THIS IS FRAME #225.  JFK IS ONLY NOW REACHING FOR HIS THROAT.  IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO NOT HAVE REACTED BY NOW TO A SHOT WHETHER IT HIT HIS BACK AND WENT THRU HIS THROAT OR IF IT WAS AN ENTRANCE SHOT TO HIS THROAT.  FORENSIC PATHOLOGISTS AGREE THAT IT WOULD BE LESS THAN 1/2 SEC FOR HIM TO REACT TO ANY OF THESE SHOTS FRONT OR BACK.  AT 18.3 ZAPRUDER FRAMES PER SECOND.  THE EARLIEST THAT JFK COULD HAVE BEEN HIT, USING THIS REFERENCE POINT (Z 225 TO Z 216 OR 9 FRAMES) IS Z FRAME 216.


CHRIS, THIS IS FRAME 236.  CONNALLY SHOWS HIS FIRST INDICATION OF BEING HIT.  HIS CHEEK IS PUFFING BECAUSE OF HIS PUNCTURED RIB INTO HIS LUNG.  FROM Z 216 TO Z 236 IS 20 FRAMES OR 1.2+ SECONDS.

FIRST, HOW DOES A BULLET HANG IN THE AIR FOR MORE THAN ONE SECOND TRAVELING FROM JFK TO CONNALLY FROM Z 225 TO Z236?

SECOND, IF CONNALLY AND J. EDGAR HOOVER SAID THAT CONNALLY WAS HIT BY THE SECOND SHOT, THEN HOW DID OSWALD FIRE A SHOT AT JOHN CONNALLY IF IT WOULD TAKE 2.3 SECONDS TO FIRE, RELOAD AND FIRE A RIFLE ~ WITHOUT AIMING ~ AND
THE TIME BETWEEN SHOT ONE Z 216 OR EVEN Z 207 IN THE WILLIS PHOTO TO Z 236 WHICH IS 29 FRAMES OR 29/36.6 FRAMES (18.3 FRAMES PER SECOND) OR BETTER YET,

LESS THAN 2 SECONDS (Z207 TO Z236 / 29 FRAMES / 18.3 FRAMES PER SECOND/ 1.5847 SECONDS) WHICH IS NOT 2.3 SECONDS AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT OSWALD SHOT THE RIFLE FROM ANYWHERE IN THE TSBD BUILDING!

LESSON #9 HOOVER TELLS LBJ THAT SECOND SHOT HIT CONNALLY NOT JFK

CHRIS, WHY DID HOOVER KNOW SO MUCH ABOUT THE ASSASSINATION AND AFTER TALKING TO BALLISTIC EXPERTS WOULD HE SAY AT THE 8:39 MARK IN THIS VIDEO THAT THE SECOND SHOT HIT CONNALLY AND THEN REITERATE IT TO LBJ AT 9:45 IN THEIR CONVERSATION?

LESSON #8 Ruby: Kennedy WAS killed over preference for Johnson

CHRIS, THIS IS JACK RUBY MAKING THE STATEMENT THAT IMPLICATES LBJ IN THE CONSPIRACY.  WHY WOULD HE EVEN CARE ABOUT LBJ IF HE WAS JUST A PATRIOT TRYING TO SAVE JACKIE KENNEDY THE PAIN OF A TRIAL FOR LHO?  NO CHRIS, HE WAS SPILLING THE BEANS OF HIS ROLE IN THE CONSPIRACY

LESSON #8A Jack Ruby's Conspiracy Explained

CHRIS, LISTEN TO JACK RUBY'S WORDS.  HE TOLD US EVERYTHING THAT MADE THE CONSPIRACY PLAUSIBLE.  WAS HE A CONSPIRACY RESEARCHER?  NO HE WAS TRYING TO SAVE HIS LIFE AND HIS BROTHERS BY SPILLING THE BEANS ON THE CONSPIRACY

LESSON # 6 JACKIE KENNEDY TRIES TO CATCH JFK'S BRAIN AS IT FLIES OUT OF HIS HEAD BACK AND TO THE LEFT

CHRIS, AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE ZAPRUDER FRAME 326 ABOVE, JACKIE KENNEDY'S HAND IS BEHIND JFK'S HEAD ATTEMPTING TO CATCH HIS BRAINS AS THEY ARE HEADED BACK AND TO THE LEFT OF THE LIMOUSINE, AND AS YOU CAN SEE, OFFICER HARGIS IS ABOUT TO BE COMPLETELY SPLATTERED WITH BRAINS, BLOOD AND SKULL FROM JFK'S HEAD.  THE OTHER OFFICER AT THE RIGHT REAR OF THE LIMO WAS HIT WITH A MINISCULE AMOUNT OF THIS SPLATTER.  OFFICER HARGIS SAID,

Mr. HARGIS - Well, at the time it sounded like the shots were right next to me. There wasn't any way in the world I could tell where they were coming from, but at the time there was something in my head that said that they probably could have been coming from the railroad overpass, because I thought since I had got splattered, with blood--I was Just a little back and left of--Just a little bit back and left of Mrs. Kennedy, but I didn't know. I had a feeling that it might have been from the Texas Book Depository, and these two places was the primary place that could have been shot from.

LESSON #5 DR. ROBERT SHAW / CONNALLY WOUND 1.5 CM WIDE

CHRIS, THE WOUND IN JOHN CONNALLY'S BACK WAS AN ENTRANCE WOUND OF 1.5CM WIDE LIKE THE 1.5 CM WIDE WOUND IN JFK'S BACK.  BOTH WERE ENTRANCE WOUNDS AND BOTH HAD WOUND COLLARS.  A TUMBLING BULLET OF THE SINGLE BULLET THEORY COULD NOT HAVE ACCOMPLISHED THIS FEAT.  PLUS, DR. ROBERT SHAW DESCRIBED THE ENTRANCE WOUND IN CONNALLY AS A  "TUNNELING WOUND" WHICH IS INDICATIVE TO A DIRECT SHOT NOT A "TUMBLING" BULLET FROM JFK'S WOUNDS.  CONNALLY FIRST DESCRIBED HIS BACK WOUND AS BEING SEPARATE FROM THE FIRST SHOT THAT HIT THE PRESIDENT.   HE SAID HE WAS HIT BY THE SECOND SHOT.

The wound in Connally’s back did not indicate a sideways hit any more than the wound in the back of Kennedy’s head.  The latter was 1.5 x 0.6 centimeters, and the former, 1.5 x 0.8 centimeters, as documented on at least four occasions by the governor’s thoracic surgeon, Dr. Robert Shaw.  (4WCH104, 107; 6WCH85, 86).   The holes in the back of Connally’s shirt and jacket were as small as his back wound. (5WCH64) (See TABLE below.)  The damage inside Connally’s chest also disproves a sideways hit.  According to Shaw, the bullet created a "small tunneling wound" (7HSCA149) and he noted, "the neat way in which it stripped the rib out without doing much damage to the muscles that lay on either side of it."  (4WCH116)   Shaw felt that the shape of the bullet was explained either by a “slight tumbling,” or by it striking at a tangent. (6WCH95)   It had to have been a tangential hit since the bullet  “followed the line of declination of the fifth rib” (4WCH105), i.e., its path slanted downward. 

Connally’s back wound became 3 centimeters when it was surgically enlarged.   Shaw explained that in order to clean and debride (cut away devitalized tissue) the wound, he had to enlarge it to twice its size.  (6WCH88)

CONNALLY AT 6:30 OF HIS INTERVIEW: I WAS HIT BY THE SECOND SHOT.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvUaJLrdoSs

LESSON #4 OSWALD AND HIS RIFLE THAT HE DIDN'T SHOOT

CHRIS, THIS SHOULD EXPLAIN TO YOU HOW OSWALD DIDN'T SHOOT HIS RIFLE AND HIT JFK.  IT'S ALL FROM WARREN COMMISSION TESTIMONY AND HSCA DOCUMENTS (HOUSE SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS

I was reading Peter North's book, and I found something rather interesting regarding the rifle. A supposed "Oswald" went into at The Irving Sport Shop (Dale Ryder owner) with his family speaking Russian and asked the owner about getting a firing pin fixed on his rifle. That was the extent of it. Then, after the assassination, a rifle repair receipt from the shop said "OSWALD" on it. The repair was for 3 holes to be drilled into the rifle for a scope and some other minor cleaning. NO FIRING PIN REPAIRED. OSWALD MANNLICHER HAD A 2 HOLE SCOPE MOUNT.

Interestingly, the scope on Oswald's rifle was for a left handed shooter. Oswald was a right shot (HSCA). And as funny as it may seem, the paraffin test on Oswald's cheek showed no shot residue, and no fingerprints of Oswald's was found by the FBI on the rifle. However, after these tests ~ and Oswald's death, the Dallas Police found a right palm print on underside of the rifle in a shooting position for a left handed shooter. And guess what, it was in a position that only a left handed shooter could hold the rifle.

Warren Commission Testimony / Allen Dulles also present
Mr. EISENBERG. Could you tell us which of those prints you so identified?
Mr. MANDELLA. There was a photograph, a photograph of the underside of the gun barrel, Commission Exhibit No.-
Mr. EISENBERG. That is Commission Exhibit No. 658, and I will hand you that photograph now. You are referring to this photograph?
Mr. MANDELLA. Yes.
Mr. EISENBERG. And can you read the writing on the back of that?
Mr. MANDELLA. "Right palm Oswald underside gun barrel")